Thursday, October 18, 2007

Maybe the military knows something...

A Houston Chronicle analysis of campaign contributions from January through September reveals that donors identifying themselves as affiliated with the military have donated more to the Obama and Paul campaigns than other campaigns. Obama and Texas lawmaker Ron Paul are both critics of the Iraq war.

While the amounts involved are miniscule ($53968 and $63440, respectively), analysts say the donations may suggest "unease" with the situation in Iraq.

Texas A&M political science professor George C. Edwards III said Obama's military affiliated donations may also be due to the proportionately larger number of African-Americans serving in the military.

One of Paul's contributors is retired Army chaplain Lindell Anderson, who said, "As a Christian, I think (Paul) speaks to a theme that the United States shouldn't be the policeman of the world." Anderson donated $100.

An American Legion spokeswoman was rather condescending about the Paul donations, saying "I don't know the rhyme or reason behind it. It's America. Anybody can throw their money at who they want." The AL has endorsed Paul in the past because of his stance on veterans' issues, though the organization is obviously pro-war.

This information speaks for itself, but to speak to the point, this information, along with recent reports that the military brass is less than thrilled about progress in Iraq, says that the military may be the people to listen to here. After all, it is the military that knows firsthand the human costs of war.

In historical perspective, as wrong as America's involvement in Viet Nam was, it has long been held that the outcome would have been 
different if the military had been given free rein. Similarly, if the military bigs 
had been more closely consulted about Iraq I'm certain their recommendations 
would have been to either not go in or to go in full bore.

Full disclosure: I have donated $10 to the Draft Gore '08 campaign.

No comments: